11/28/2014

Opfinger, "Two Sides of a Medal: the Changing Relationship between Religious Diversity and Religiosity"

ROSEReligious Market Theory assigns basic market principles to the market for religion. The derived supply-side model proposes that religiosity is higher on a competitive market, characterized by high religious diversity. Churches will provide higher quality goods compared to monopolistic churches. The demand-side model, originating from the Secularization Hypothesis, suggests that the establishment of new churches casts doubt on the existing religion, which reduces overall religiosity. I find a negative linear relationship between religious diversity and religiosity which supports the demand-side model. However, high levels of income and democracy mitigate this effect. For high levels of education and immigration, the relationship even turns to positive. The demand-side model seems to dominate in less-developed countries. This effect appears to vanish in the most industrialized countries.

Matthias Opfinger, "Two Sides of a Medal: the Changing Relationship between Religious Diversity and Religiosity." Review of Social Economy, 72/4 (2014), pp. 523-548.

11/27/2014

Solari and Gambarotto, "Territorial Rooting as an Element of Well-Being"

ROSEThe paper discusses the relevance of the idea of rooting as proposed by Simone Weil and builds a social economic framework to study its role in our life. Rooting is connected to the need of belonging and to have an identity. These elements are identified in some different areas of research—social psychology and social economy—to analyze how this need of the person is taken into account. Then, a theoretical framework to study rooting is presented developing the concept of plural utility and capabilities. The end is to discuss one of the neglected dimensions of human needs in the context of modern society. Finally, some conclusion concerning both individual choices related to rooting and well-being will be proposed.

Stefano Solari and Francesca Gambarotto, "Territorial Rooting as an Element of Well-Being." Review of Social Economy, 72/4 (2014), pp. 504-522.

11/26/2014

Nega and Schneider, "NGOs, the State, and Development in Africa"

ROSEThis paper discusses the impact of the rise of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and social entrepreneurs on economic development, with a special focus on how they have been used in Africa. The paper describes the decline of the state and the rise of NGOs as a force in economic development under neoliberalism. We then turn to two of the major problems with the roll-back of the state in Africa: the inherent weaknesses of nonstate actors in the development process, and the significant cost that is incurred by undermining the role of state. The paper concludes by suggesting the necessity of reinserting the state as the major vehicle for economic development, albeit in productive partnership with NGOs and social entrepreneurs.

Berhanu Nega and Geoffrey Schneider, "NGOs, the State, and Development in Africa." Review of Social Economy, 72/4 (2014), pp. 485-503.

11/25/2014

Dang, "Amartya Sen's Capability Approach: A Framework for Well-Being Evaluation and Policy Analysis?"

ROSEThe aim of this paper is twofold: first, we discuss the main conceptual and methodological issues related to the operationalization of Amartya Sen's capability approach. Second, we review quantitative applications of the capability approach in different domains to examine how methodological and empirical challenges are addressed. The use of the capability approach implies a broadening of the “informational basis of judgments” and thereby leads to conclusions that differ from those drawn using standard economic approaches.

Ai-Thu Dang, "Amartya Sen's Capability Approach: A Framework for Well-Being Evaluation and Policy Analysis?" Review of Social Economy, 72/4 (2014), pp. 460-484. 

11/24/2014

Wight, "Economics within a Pluralist Ethical Tradition" (Presidential Address)

ROSEEthical pluralism is the recognition that multiple ethical frameworks operate in social settings to solve problems of moral hazard. In particular, non-consequentialist considerations of duty and virtue operate to restrain self-interest and lower transaction costs in exchange, such as when asymmetric information exists. Positive economics has tended to rely exclusively on a behavioral model that assumes utility maximization, but this approach fails to give credit to the neglected foundations of duty and virtue. Consequences, duties, and virtues all play a role in sustaining businesses, for example, and in promoting the search for truth within the economic research community. Normative welfare economics can also benefit from understanding vertical and horizontal pluralism.

Jonathan B. Wight, "Economics within a Pluralist Ethical Tradition."  Review of Social Economy, 72/4 (2014), pp. 417-435. This article is the Presidential Address given at the 2014 ASE/ASSA meetings.

11/23/2014

Johnson, Robson, and Taengnoi, "A Meta-analysis of the Gender Gap in Performance in Collegiate Economics Courses"

ROSEThe conventional wisdom has been that men outperform otherwise equivalent women in collegiate economics courses. Recent work in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields documenting gains by women suggests that it is time to reevaluate the gender performance gap in economics. Surveying 68 studies containing 235 distinct regressions published since 1980, we find that 68.4% of regressions report men outperform women, though this is only statistically significant in 30.7% of regressions. Although the literature points to numerous reasons for this gap, our focus is on the effects of study design and the impact of broad socio-cultural changes over time. Using meta-regression analysis, we find that the likelihood of observing a statistically significant gap has declined noticeably, by almost 3% annually. Although the drop may not be as large as in some STEM fields, the result is highly robust to the specification of the time trend and the model.

Marianne Johnson, Denise Robson & Sarinda Taengnoi, "A Meta-analysis of the Gender Gap in Performance in Collegiate Economics Courses." Review of Social Economy, 72/4 (2014), pp. 436-459. THIS ARTICLE IS OPEN ACCESS FOR A LIMITED TIME.

11/03/2014

Professor Frederic Sterling Lee (1949-2014): An Appreciation

Fred lee

Fred Lee passed away on 23rd October 2014 following a brave fight against lung cancer.  It is a significant honour for me that the President of the Association for Social Economics (ASE), Prof Mark White, invited me to write a few words commemorating and celebrating Fred’s substantial, and valued contribution to the ASE, and to the wider community of heterodox economics.  This task fills me with considerable sadness as I count myself as one of the many fortunate people whose lives were enriched by Fred, both professionally and personally, and I will miss him dearly.  I feel deep sympathy for Fred’s family: Ruth, his wife, Sally, their daughter, her husband, and Fred’s two granddaughters.  I hope that appreciations such as this, the many condolences posted on Fred Lee’s website (http://heterodoxnews.com/leefs/), and the moving tribute from Fred’s former PhD student, Dr Tae-Hee Jo, are of some comfort to Fred’s family and friends.

Fred was born in November 1949 in New York and grew up in Virginia.  From an early age Fred was interested in progressive politics, and never lost this interest or enthusiasm.  After graduating with a History degree in the 1970s, Fred, together with Ruth, worked in Saudi Arabia for a few years.  Later in the 1970s he returned to education, embarking upon his economics studies initially at Columbia University in New York.  It was here that he met Alfred Eichner who encouraged Fred to study for a PhD.  During this period, Fred and Ruth spent time in Edinburgh, Scotland.  Despite the PhD programme at Edinburgh not being to his liking, Fred later told me that he rated the city as one of his favorite places.  I’m sure he didn’t just tell me this because I’m a native of Glasgow.

Fred graduated from Rutgers University in 1983 with a PhD, writing his dissertation on Post Keynesian micro theory.  As Fred observed in his short autobiography: ‘Predestined to Heterodoxy or How I Became a Heterodox Economist’:

When I entered Rutgers I was a Post Keynesian-heterodox economist; and with (Paul) Davidson, (Jan) Kregel, Eichner, and Nina Shapiro as my professors, there was no chance that I would deviate. (http://heterodoxnews.com/leefs/cv/predestine/)

From his PhD thesis Fred started to publish papers on Post Keynesian microeconomics, especially related to Gardiner Means’ approach to pricing.  Alfred Eichner was a major influence on Fred’s approach, Fred describing Eichner as his “mentor and friend”.

Following graduation from Rutgers, Fred taught at the University of California – Riverside; Roosevelt University, then crossing the Atlantic to England to teach at Staffordshire Polytechnic (Stoke-on-Trent) and De Montfort University (Leicester); returning to the US in 2000 to the University of Missouri at Kansas City (UMKC) where he spent the rest of his career.  Fred retained a great affinity and affection for the places he taught.  In the summer of 2014 he revisited his old stomping grounds in Stoke and Leicester.

Fred served on the editorial board of the Review of Social Economy from 2006 until he assumed the editorship of the American Journal of Economics and Sociology in 2009-10.  He also served as a trustee of the ASE, and was a highly active member of the association and the editorial board.  He was awarded the Helen Potter Prize in 1988 for his article entitled: ‘A New Dealer in Agriculture: G. C. Means and the Writing of Industrial Prices’ published in the Review.

Of course, Fred’s work was recognized by other fraternal associations, such as the European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy, EAEPE, which awarded him the Gunnar Myrdal Prize in 2000 for his monograph entitled: Post Keynesian Price Theory.  The Myrdal Prize is awarded to the best monograph that broadly reflects the theoretical perspectives of EAEPE.  Fred’s academic interests were many and varied, transcending the boundaries of the heterodox economic associations.  Nonetheless, he was especially noted for his work on price theory from a Post Keynesian perspective; developing the work of institutionalist economist, Gardner Means, Post Keynesian, Michal Kalecki, and industrial economist, Philip W. S. Andrews.  Later in his career, Fred worked on the history of heterodox economics, particularly in the Anglophone world, and strategies to develop the impact of heterodox economics journals.  He also made telling contributions to the debate over the impact of the research assessment exercise on the evolution of economics in the UK, and how this further marginalized heterodox economists.  Last year he assumed the role of President of the Association for Evolutionary Economics, AFEE, a position he vigorously and enthusiastically served until his passing.

Despite his numerous academic achievements, Fred is perhaps best known for his tireless work in promoting the causes of heterodox economics and economists.  Fred was passionate about the institution building and reproduction of heterodox economics.  In this his contribution is enormous.  He was instrumental in establishing the UK-based Association for Heterodox Economics (AHE) in 1999.  The AHE was initially established to offer economists the opportunity to present heterodox work that they were not afforded at the annual conference of the Royal Economic Society (RES).  Fred was struck how North American economists could present heterodox work at the premier US economics meetings, under the auspices of the Allied Social Science Associations (ASSA), but that no such facility existed in the UK.  However, the RES had no desire to adopt the ASSA model, and hence the AHE swiftly became established as a successful heterodox economics association hosting an annual conference that attracts many scholars from all over Europe and beyond.  Fred was awarded honorary life membership of the AHE.  Indeed, despite battling cancer, he was able to present a keynote lecture to the 2014 AHE conference at the University of Greenwich in July.  Fred’s address was typically powerful and provocative as he presented a finely crafted critique of mainstream price theory.  It is a testament to his enthusiasm, stamina, and willingness to advance the cause of heterodox economics that he presented his lecture and answered questions following his address in a session that lasted around two hours.

As part of his innovative institution-building strategy for heterodox economics, Fred launched the Heterodox Economics Newsletter in 2004, passing the editorial baton to Tae-Hee Jo and Ted Schmidt in 2009.  This was a significant undertaking as the Newsletter seeks to collate and disseminate information about conferences, job vacancies, journal publications, edited volumes, and books within heterodox schools of thought.

Fred’s enthusiasm for the reproduction of heterodoxy is also evident from his contribution to teaching and learning.  Having visited UMKC on a number of occasions, I have no doubts of his popularity among his students, who saw him as generous with his time, enthusiastic for his subject and his students: in short, inspiring.  Indeed, Tae-Hee Jo highlights Fred’s concern about heterodox economics students when recounting that upon learning that he had terminal cancer, Fred and Ruth immediately moved to establish a fund to finance heterodox economics students in heterodox PhD programmes.

Again, whether it was establishing associations, foundations, newsletters, welcoming visiting scholars to UMKC, contributing his time to the varied heterodox economics associations, or manning the International Confederation of Associations for Pluralism in Economics, ICAPE, booth at ASSA meetings, Fred was prepared to advance the cause of pluralism in economics and progressive economic thought in whatever way he could.  His energy and enthusiasm were astounding.  Quite simply, he was inspirational.

From a personal perspective, two episodes of my encounters with Fred illustrate what a special individual he was.  First: on the occasions I visited UMKC, Fred organized a series of events around guest lectures and seminars to staff and students.  These events were designed to introduce UMKC students to international scholars, and for these scholars to exchange knowledge within a vibrant and exciting heterodox economics campus.  The atmosphere was intellectually stimulating, and participants were supportive and highly encouraging in seeking to progress research and teaching in heterodox economics.  Fred expended much time and effort to ensure that visitors were welcomed and supported in their work.  Having been a beneficiary of this hospitality, I am extremely grateful.  Second, during the summer of 2014, Fred observed that he was fortunate in that he was receiving excellent medical care.  Many in his position may have (with understandable justification) observed their misfortune.  For me, this was the measure of the man: his glass was always at least half-full.  He was a caring, affable, and optimistic person with seemingly boundless energy and enthusiasm.  I count myself as privileged to have known Fred and count him as a friend.  I’ll miss his intellectual drive at conferences and other gatherings.  More than this, I’ll miss Fred the person: his beaming, mischievous smile, and good humour.

A memorial service for Fred will be held on Saturday, November 8th, at 1:00pm in the Ethical Society of St. Louis, 9001 Clayton Road, St. Louis, Missouri.  His ashes will be scattered at a later date at the Haymarket Martyrs Monument in Chicago, IL. Condolences may be sent via Fred Lee’s website at: http://heterodoxnews.com/leefs and memorial contributions can be made to the Frederic S. Lee Heterodox Economics Scholarship Fund which is housed at the Kansas City Community Foundation. Donations can be made at: https://gkccfonlinedonations.org/give/leeh00.asp.

 

Robert McMaster

Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow

31st October 2014

(I thank Prof Tae-Hee Jo and John Henry for their guidance in ensuring the accuracy of this appreciation.  Of course, any remaining errors are mine alone.)

10/30/2014

Call for papers: 15th World Congress of Social Economics

15th World Congress of Social Economics

“Doing Social Economics”

Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada, June 23-24, 2015

 

Social economics is the study of the ethical and social causes and consequences of economic behavior, institutions, organizations, theory, and policy. Social economists engage in many types of research, from explorations of the history and philosophy of economics to quantitative and qualitative examinations of contemporary economic life; and from historical studies of economic activity and institutions to recommendations for policy agendas. The practice and meaning of social economics is continuously defined and redefined by these diverse research agendas. The 15th World Congress in Social Economics will afford us the opportunity to take stock of who we are as social economists and how our work advances our values and principles.

We welcome proposals for individual papers and complete sessions—conceptual, applied, and empirical—related to the theme of the conference as well as all areas of social economics. Some topics for discussion might include:

  • What makes research in social economics distinct? 
  • How do social economists practice their craft?
  • What key concepts and/or theoretical constructs mark research by social economists?
  • How do social economists engage with economic life and economic policy? 
  • How do social economists provide insights on aspects of the economy that are often neglected by other economists?
  • What social economic principles should guide the construction of economic institutions and social practices? 
  • How does the history of social economics inform current work in the field? 
  • What are the different meanings of the terms “social economy” and “social economics” in North America, Europe, and elsewhere? 
  • What concepts, perspectives, and methodologies do social economists share with other schools of economic, philosophical, and political thought?  Is social economics pluralist?  Should it be?
  • What kinds of methodologies do social economists employ in their research?

Abstract Submissions

To submit a proposal, please visit the Association for Social Economics web site at http://www.socialeconomics.org/ (note: the submissions page is not live yet) and upload an abstract of approximately 400 words. Please include the title of the session or paper, the authors’ names and institutional affiliations, and contact information in the form of an email address for the corresponding author.  At least one author of each paper presented at the World Congress must be a member of the Association for Social Economics. (To join, please visit this link.)

The submissions page will open in November. The deadline for submissions is Friday, February 20, 2015. You will be notified by March 20, 2015.  

Summer School in Social Economics

The Association for Social Economics announces an exciting Summer School workshop for graduate students and recent Ph.D.s. to be held in conjunction with the World Congress of Social Economics. Between 12-18 fellows will be selected to attend the Summer School as guests of ASE.  The Summer School begins the evening of June 21 and continues on June 22, 2015. Fellows accepted to the Summer School will receive complementary room and meals for the Summer School and the World Congress, complementary registration to the World Congress, plus all Summer School materials.

Accepted fellows must become members of ASE and submit a Summer School refundable deposit of $100 (that will be returned upon completion of the World Congress). All fellows must commit to participating in all sessions of the Summer School and to staying for the entire World Congress.

Elba Brown-Collier Best Student Paper Award

This award, sponsored by the Association for Social Economics (ASE), is presented at the World Congress for Social Economics to the author of the best paper by a graduate student on a topic in social economics, also demonstrating strong promise for future scholarly contributions. Professors (or others who have completed their graduate degrees) cannot be coauthors.

To be eligible for the award, the student author must register for the conference and present his/her paper. Please submit your paper proposal through the regular submission process described above, indicating that you wish it to be considered for the prize. Following notification of acceptance in March, the full paper should be submitted for consideration by May 20, 2015.  The status of each author must be clearly stipulated (MA student, PhD student, etc.) For consideration, the paper should be no longer than 8,000 words.

The Elba Brown-Collier Award Committee, composed of members of the Association for Social Economics, will adjudicate the submitted papers. The winner of the Elba Brown-Collier Best Student Paper Award for 2015 receives:

  • $400 USD
  • One year’s membership in ASE which includes subscriptions to Review of Social Economy and Forum for Social Economics.

World Congress Organizing Committee

Robert W. Dimand, Brock University

Mark D. White, College of Staten Island/CUNY

Ellen Mutari, Richard Stockton College of New Jersey

Elba Brown-Collier, Association for Social Economics

Giuseppe Fontana, University of Leeds and University of Sannio

10/28/2014

Call for papers: AFEE/ASE/URPE at EEA in Honor and Memory of Frederic S. Lee

AFEE/ASE/URPE Call for Papers/Proposals –In Honor and Memory of Frederic S. Lee

2015 Eastern Economic Association Annual Meeting, New York City, February 26-March 1.

AFEE/ASE/URPE are co-organizing special joint sessions at the 2015 Eastern Economic Association meetings in honor and memory of our friend and colleague Professor Frederic Lee. The meetings will be held in NYC, February 26-March 1 2015. We invite individual papers and complete sessions for these sessions. Fred Lee’s contributions to heterodox economics was vast, spanning from price theory, heterodox microeconomics, heterodox microfoundations of macroeconomics, history of heterodox economics, production theory, critical realism, and grounded theory.

The deadline for proposal submissions for these special sessions has been extended to November 21, 2014.

Please submit your paper or session proposal to Michael J. Murray (mmurray@bemidjistate.edu) and Robert Scott (rscott@monmouth.edu). Please indicate at time of submission that you would like your paper/session to be included in the Fred Lee special sessions.

10/24/2014

Fred Lee, RIP

FredWe are very sad to report that our dear friend and colleague, Fred Lee, has passed away.

In the words of his longtime UMKC colleague John Henry, "It is with great sadness that I inform the ASE community that Fred Lee passed away last night. Given his deterioration over the last week, this was something of a welcome relief. The tentative date for his memorial service is November 8, but an announcement as to the details will be forthcoming."

A longer post of remembrance can be found here.